Adobe Reader updated to 9.3.3

Adobe has updated Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader to version 9.3.3. The patch is available from the Help menu, under ‘Check for Updates’, and it’s an important security patch, correcting security holes currently being exploited by malware.

The patch alone is NOT adequate. ALSO, go to Edit, Preferences, and UNCHECK these two items:
In JavaScript, the top item ‘Enable Acrobat JavaScript’ should be unchecked.
In Trust Manager, the top item, ‘Allow opening of non-PDF file attachments with external applications’ should be unchecked.

The list of the most-commonly installed web file viewers and their current patch levels and links to version tests and installers has been updated, it’s here: //www.startupware.com/patches

Startupware Made Me Look Like This (FunWebProducts Report)

OR: Creating Avatars with Toolbars and Search Hooks

by Jerry Stern
Webmaster, Startupware.com

OK, I look like this now.

Well, maybe only kinda.

This project started out with a web ad. It told me that I could look like a character from the movie ‘Avatar.’ I’ve seen the ads before, clicked through to see what it was, and then shut down the page fast when I saw that there was a Flash plug-in and a membership form to agree to. This time, I said, well, let’s check it out. On my test machine, not the production box. With extreme caution.

OK, off to the XP test box. At the moment, it’s running XP Pro, Service Pack 3, fully-patched, and Microsoft Security Essentials Anti-Virus, and has no other security in place, no data, and no significant software other than patched versions of Adobe Flash and Sun Java.

The link from the ad was to mycartoon(dot)info, which immediately redirected to imakemoolah(dot)com, which then immediately redirected to home(dot)zwinky(dot)com. Note the past tense; as I write this, a week later, the link has changed, and the final step now goes to home(dot)mywebface(dot)com.

Neither of these sites contains the promised ‘Avatar’ look. The ad also implies that I can convert a photo. That’s not there, either. What was there is Zwinky, apparently an online ‘community’ using cartoon avatars. It invited me to create my Zwinky character. OK, so I did. There is a required sign-up for a membership in the online Zwinky site, and an email address is required (I used one of my temporary emails, and it has not been spammed, so far). Here’s what I found along the way, in case you find this on a computer during a cleanup.

First off, Internet Explorer 8 warned me of an Active X control installation. There is a basic warning that I’m installing the MyWebSearch toolbar. Note that the page is from Zwinky, but the download is from imgfarm(dot)com, while the source of the download is from their SmileyCentral project. It’s all very spread out over multiple sites.

Next, there is a clue that multiple products are included. The Internet Explorer Security Warning identifies the download as being from Fun Web Products, and includes “Zwinky, My Web Search, Search Assistant, and Easy…” The line is cut off; could go on for a ways yet.

Finally, my screen begins to show something that’s closer to what I clicked on:

And done:

OK, I UNCHECK both boxes, and click finish. The mywebsearch toolbar appears anyway, and I’m taken to the Zwinky page to create a character.

OK, now let’s look at what else is happening in the background.
I ran HijackThis, and checked the log; and it’s immediately apparent that this product is startupware–all these items are new:

R3 – URLSearchHook: (no name) – {00A6FAF6-072E-44cf-8957-5838F569A31D} – C:\Program Files\MyWebSearch\bar\1.bin\MWSSRCAS.DLL
O2 – BHO: MyWebSearch Search Assistant BHO – {00A6FAF1-072E-44cf-8957-5838F569A31D} – C:\Program Files\MyWebSearch\bar\1.bin\MWSSRCAS.DLL
O2 – BHO: mwsBar BHO – {07B18EA1-A523-4961-B6BB-170DE4475CCA} – C:\Program Files\MyWebSearch\bar\1.bin\MWSBAR.DLL
O3 – Toolbar: My Web Search – {07B18EA9-A523-4961-B6BB-170DE4475CCA} – C:\Program Files\MyWebSearch\bar\1.bin\MWSBAR.DLL
-runkey
O4 – HKLM\..\Run: [My Web Search Bar Search Scope Monitor] “C:\PROGRA~1\MYWEBS~1\bar\1.bin\m3SrchMn.exe” /m=2 /w /h
O4 – HKLM\..\Run: [MyWebSearch Email Plugin] C:\PROGRA~1\MYWEBS~1\bar\1.bin\mwsoemon.exe
O4 – HKCU\..\Run: [MyWebSearch Email Plugin] C:\PROGRA~1\MYWEBS~1\bar\1.bin\mwsoemon.exe
O8 – Extra context menu item: &Search – http://tbedits.mywebsearch.com/one-toolbaredits/menusearch.jhtml?s=100000338&p=ZJxdm3802MUS&si=40699&a=..bh6qJGzk7dFMyFxzxTDA&n=2010061710
O16 – DPF: {1D4DB7D2-6EC9-47A3-BD87-1E41684E07BB} – http://ak.exe.imgfarm.com/images/nocache/funwebproducts/ei-4/ZwinkyInitialSetup1.0.1.1.cab
O23 – Service: My Web Search Service (MyWebSearchService) – MyWebSearch.com – C:\PROGRA~1\MYWEBS~1\bar\1.bin\mwssvc.exe

In order, note the URL search hook in group R3, the two toolbars (group O2, Browser Helper Objects), and the installed service in group 23. Big product, by any measure.

Next, I took a look at the C: drive. Under Program Files, there’s 6Mb of files under ‘MyWebSearch’ and ‘0.6 Mb’ under ‘FunWebProducts’ that contains 4 folders and only 1 file. Over in Control Panel, there is one new entry, for “My Web Search (Zwinky)”, listed as 6.29 Mb. I’ll run that later.

Next, I go back into Internet Explorer. It opens to my usual home page of ‘about:blank’, so that’s OK–remember, I did decline the home page change earlier. I tried to turn off the toolbar, and here’s the result–I chose to disable :

OK, back to Control Panel. Ran the uninstaller. There’s one confirmation screen, and I chose to remove all features. A reboot is needed, OK. There’s a file left behind in c:\Program Files, so I delete ‘Uninstall Fun Web Products.dll’. A second pass through HijackThis shows one straggler autostart item–I removed it manually:

O16 – DPF: {1D4DB7D2-6EC9-47A3-BD87-1E41684E07BB} – http://ak.exe.imgfarm.com/images/nocache/funwebproducts/ei-4/ZwinkyInitialSetup1.0.1.1.cab

Now, as invasive as this product is, their online drawing program does work easily. In case my readers are tempted to go there, and create an avatar, like I did–be warned. The avatar can’t be saved or exported, it’s only usable on Zwinky, and you can create only one, so it’s pretty limited overall. The images I’ve created were done using creative and major browser zooming on the page, then screen captures, imports of the captures into Corel Draw! X4 for a bitmap-to-vector conversion, more tweaking and editing, isolation of the head for some versions, and so on. I invested 90 minutes, and someone with less familiarity with drawing software would not end up with a usable avatar.

So what is all this? It looks like a URL search grabber, with a major content delivery system of cute drawing programs that can’t save files. Zwinky.com does, at least, have a visible means of financial support in the ads on their site, but they also have a link on the footer to their affiliate program, where they claim no spyware (right, just a search hook), no adware, high industry payouts, and association with webfetti, CursorMania, and “in partnership with neverblue”.

Let’s make this clear–these items are misleading, invasive, and possibly not quite fraudulent (in the legal sense), but they are clearly not drive-by downloads, except in one sense: The names are all mismatched. I click on mycartoon(dot)info, and pass through imakemoolah, to zwinky, download from imgfarm, and end up with FunWebProducts and MyWebSearch. Many end users aren’t watching that closely.

As far as cleanups go, when I have an infected PC on my desk, the usual situation is that there is some malware that was of unknown origin (didn’t see any on these sites, as of June 2010), so I go looking, and I find there are 10 autostart entries for one web application that my customer doesn’t remember installing, plus a variety of other items of similar unknown origin, so they all come out. For me to leave them alone would require that the install did not include a search hook, a toolbar, or an installed Windows service, and this combination of mismatched web sites delivers all three, and there is no need for a web page to run 10 autoplays. Delete that.

And that’s a shame, too. If these programs ran without the toolbars and autostarts, with no associated search hook baggage, and could save images easily, they would be worth paying for. Oh, well.

How to Write Instructions

Written by Jerry Stern
Chief Technical Officer at Science Translations

In the brave new world of always-online software, help files have changed. We used to write HLP files. Now, it’s compiled hypertext, or CHM files, or sometimes, it’s a web page, and not much else. Format shouldn’t affect function, but it does–the industry is getting horribly sloppy, and have forgotten that help files are about teaching, and are not about searching.
What has to be in Help?

A help file, regardless of the format, needs some basic structure. Certain questions have to be answered; they’re the same questions that applied in writing class. When writing Exposition, or writing that explains, or Reporting, writing about events, include as many of these as possible: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. Mostly, help files won’t include a lot of ‘why’, but try for all of them. When writing a help document, start with this outline, and expect to change the headings when it’s almost finished:

• What does the software do? Include a short description of what the software does. This isn’t a sales pitch–it’s an introduction to the software, what the workflow of the program is like, and what kind of projects are possible in the software.

• How do I get started? Include the simplest possible project, how to start creating a task, how to learn about the program, and how to save, export, publish, or display the finished task–not all of these apply to every program–choose the simplest case, and explain it.

• Where are the commands and functionality? Tell the user where you’ve hidden all that wonderful functionality, in toolbars, in the menus, in keyboard shortcuts.

• When do I use these menu choices? Include the basic sequence of steps in an introductory project.

• Why do I choose to do things this way? This is why your software matches the workflow for a specific task, best to follow a specific sequence, or it can be a description of several sequences of tasks that will work, using your software product.

• Who published it, and who are they? Include contact information, links to additional help, tutorials, and updates.

First things First

When writing step-by-step instructions, sequence is your top priority. Here’s a horrible example:

You can change the settings for communications. Check off “use alternate port” in options.

What’s wrong with that? Well, it’s vague–it doesn’t say why or when you would use these instructions. It’s out of sequence–the steps are not in the order that they become visible to a user; first list where to go, then what to do. Not what to do first and then where to go–that encourages reading backwards while the user skips forward for navigation, and back again for the option to click. Finally, it looks like the option doesn’t match the software menus, and it’s not totally clear what the menu names are labeled.

Try again:

When the software won’t connect to the remote server, an alternate port may be used. Go to the Tools menu, choose Options, and at “Use Alternate Port”, add a checkmark in the option box. Click OK to close the dialog.

What changed? First, there’s a short explanation of ‘what’ at the beginning–in real software documentation, it should be more specific. Second, the steps are strictly in the same order as a user would see them on-screen, and no steps are left out. Third, the name of the option is precisely the same as in the menu, including capitalization and underlined menu shortcut keys.

Advanced Topics

Here’s a far more complex example, taken from a WordPerfect Magazine article I wrote, way back in 1992, about creating greeting cards in WordPerfect:

Begin at the WordPerfect document screen. Press Format (Shift F8),
(2) Page, (7) Paper Size/Type, (2) Add, and (9) Other. Type ‘Card’ and press(Enter), then (8) Labels, (Y) Yes.
A new menu will appear for the label definition.

The format for magazine writing of this kind is extremely precise. Every menu label appears, with the shortcut key, and every keystroke is included, with enough information at the end to let the reader see that they’ve arrived at the right place.
This level of precision can add confusion when the program is translated. The number selections work in every language, but the letter options may not be consistent. Be careful when translating sequences of menu choices, or plan ahead during menu design to keep steps and shortcuts consistent in all languages.
Should you use this type of magazine style for help topics? On some topics, yes. Think of a short article, maybe a few paragraphs, for an extended example of how to do a task or create a project in your software. It’s a great introductory lesson, but include every step, and choose a very basic first project for the example.

Describe what Menu Options Do

I frequently wonder what a menu entry does in a program I’m trying out. I look for the matching entry in the help file. For example, under File, Export Stuff, I’ll find this:

Exports stuff in a file.

Wrong, on so many levels. First, it tells me nothing that isn’t already in the name of the menu entry. Second, it doesn’t tell me what or when or any of the other basic answers. Try again:

File, Export Stuff: Saves the current project in a special format that provides __fill-in benefit here__. The Stuff format is used for ___. This function is also known in other programs as ‘Save As’, ‘Publish To’, or ‘Send to a Service Company’.

Huh? What’s all that stuff in the last line for? Well, that fixes the next problem, of searching a help file for a function you know exists in a program, when you don’t know the name. It’s the elementary school complaint about dictionaries and spelling–“how can I look up the spelling if I can’t spell it?”

Well, when you search help for what you think an option or function is called, and don’t find it because the author has been very consistent in always calling an export an export, what happens? Not a whole lot, beyond thinking nasty thoughts. Telepathy doesn’t help; keywords do. Those alternate names are there for searching the help file by keyword.

In the Deep End without a Paddle

Many programs now have only hypertext help with search, and no table of contents. It’s very Wiki, and worthless for learning a new program. In these monsters, you can press F1 for help, and if anything happens at all, there’s a pop-up of search titles related to a topic. It should be a topic related to the screen that was displayed when F1 was pressed. That’s ideal, and that was the standard form of help, 10 years ago.

But now, too many programs display nothing but pages and pages of unfiltered word matches for every attempt to search. Make sure that the novice-level information doesn’t get buried; the users that need advanced help know how to search, and are already sold on using your program. Novice users don’t know your program, may not have bought it yet, and are easily discouraged. Keep it simple for them–quick help searches should lead to intro-level topics, and then to advanced, and not just dive into the greatest possible depths of trouble-shooting chit-chat.

No matter what the format of the help documents, include a table of contents or a good index, include an introductory lesson, and remember that help isn’t a list of dialog box names–it’s a directory of how to use your software product.

Jerry Stern runs Startupware.com, and is online at www.PC410.com.